Case Study: My Experience With Blogging

Law Blogging

Other names that refer to the legal directory are law blogging and online law journals. Entries in legal directory appear in a reverse chronological order. Trust these sites for any legal information and various judgments.

The blogging software is powerful enough to store information that can be published. Those publishing articles for the first time can also access the online journal. It allows professionals in the legal fraternity to share knowledge on the internet.

Practice groups, law firms and individual attorneys find legal directories useful to their work. The reliability and legal authority of these groups are enhanced. Law blogging is a form of centralized approach that lets members of the legal fraternity to quickly and easily share knowledge. Lawyers and law firms earns loyalty when they have legal directories. The online journal is one of the successful marketing strategies.
Incredible Lessons I’ve Learned About Blogging

Legal directories agree on defining legal precedent as sources of the law that involve past decisions by various juries developing law for use by other judges in future when making decisions on related or similar cases. The United Kingdom judicial system applies precedence based on stare decisis. The application within the English system developed from Latin including its translations.
Why No One Talks About Resources Anymore

The common corridors call it standing by decisions already made. It is the responsibility of stare decisis to offer certainty and fairness in law. There are two segments: obiter dicta and ratio decidendi. Standards of law used by a judge to decide on a particular judgment while concluding the case defines what ratio decidendi entails.

The reasons used in the delivery of a particular decision must fall in the speech provided at the end of the case. On the surface, ratio decidendi refers to a rule implied or expressed by a judge as an important factor in arriving at his or her conclusion.

the legal dictionary refers to obiter dictum constitutes issues said by the presiding judge according to the legal dictionary. Included in the list is the another judge’s in the future can follow. As an illustration, obiter dicta could be the decision of the judge if the facts turn out as different from the previous case.

The case explains why the old facts cannot bind the new judge while reaching his conclusion. Sometimes cutting an exact difference between obiter dicta and ratio decidendi becomes difficult because they flow in a continuous manner.

While making judgment in the Broome v. Cassell case, Lord Hailsham from Marylebone put forth that, it is a necessity for every court in the lower tie to agree loyally with decisions made by courts above in the hierarchy. They include the Court of Appeal because it comes second in command.